| Economics | Socium | Environment |
|---|---|---|
Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, 2022, 12(31): 39-47
DOI: 10.37100/2616-7689.2022.12(31).4
UDC 332.122:338.486
JEL CLASSIFICATION: I15, R14, Q57
Mariia Ilina
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher,
Public Institution "Institute of Environmental Economics and
Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine"
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5555-1614
DIFFERENTIATING LOCAL RECREATIONAL POLICIES IN THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH FRAMEWORK
Abstract: This paper presents some approaches to develop national and local policy of recreational natural resources use based on zonal recreational capacity, demographic properties and economic peculiarities of different areas, including mountains. Ecosystem approach is applied for the differentiation. Recreational natural resources management is the component of national policy of natural resources use. The recreational natural resources management is broader term than the recreational industry management, since the first one includes protection and restoration of the resources. The multiplicative economic effect and joint use of recreational resources with other users are key features of the industry. Significant discrepancy between the scope of available recreational resources and efficiency of their use are inherent for all Ukraine’s regions.
The multilevel algorithm of the recreational resources and industry classification of areas is developed. The algorithm concludes with several policy models of the recreational natural resources use and management taking into account types of settlements (urban, rural, and intermediate), proximity of settlements to urban centres (urbanized and peripheral), recreational capacity of areas (high, medium, and low), and economic efficiency of the local recreational industry (efficient, moderately efficient, and inefficient). Accordingly, the three types of communities’ development strategy have been identified like the recreational centre, dominant recreational industry, and recreations for locals. The novelty of this research consists in representation of approaches depicting the structure and assessing the capacity of local recreational recourses and the industry. Consequently, the multilevel algorithm classifying areas by recreational capacities and capabilities assist to define models of the local policies.
Key words: recreational resources; recreation-and-tourism industry; recreational capacity; ecosystem approach; algorithm.
Language version: English
References
1. Shtukmeyster, V. (2015). Ekonomichna sutnist rozvytku rekreatsiynoho pryrodokorystuvannya [The economic essence of the development of recreational nature use]. Sustain nature management, 3, 61-66. [In Ukrainian].
2. Rudenko, V., Vatseba, V., & Solovey, T. (2001). Pryrodo-resursnyy potentsial pryrodnykh rehioniv Ukrayiny [Natural resources potential of the natural regions of Ukraine]. Chernivtsi: Ruta. 268 р. [In Ukrainian].
3. Matsola, V. (1997). Rekreatsiyno-turystychnyy kompleks Ukrayiny [Recreational and tourist complex of Ukraine]. Lviv. 259 р. [In Ukrainian].
4. Beydik, O. (2001). Rekreatsiyno-turyst•sʹki resursy Ukrayiny: metodolohiya ta metodyka analizu, terminolohiya, rayonuvannya [Recreational and tourist resources in Ukraine: methodology and methods of the analysis, terminology, and zoning]. Kyiv: VPTS “Kyyivsʹkyy universytet”. 395 р. [In Ukrainian].
5. Cherchyk, L., & Mostenets, O. (2016). Mekhanizm zabezpechennya konkurentospromozhnosti rekreatsiynoyi systemy rehionu [Mechanism providing competitiveness of the recreational system of the region]. Lutsk: East-European National University named by Lesia Ukrainka. 2014 р. [In Ukrainian].
6. Bernini, C., & Cracolici, М. (2015). Is participation in the tourism market an opportunity for everyone? Some evidence from Italy. Tourism Economics, 22 (1), 57-79.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2014.0409
7. Massidda, C., & Etzo, І. (2012). The determinants of Italian domestic tourism: A panel data analysis. Tourism management, 33 (3), 603-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.06.017
8. Yakovenko, I., & Tahan, T. (2009). Sutnist i spetsyfichni osoblyvosti terytorialnoyi rekreatsiynoyi nerivnosti [Essence and specific features of the territorial recreational inequality]. Culture of the Black Sea People, 152, 50-54. [In Ukrainian].
9. Bezugly, I. (2014). Imperatyvy rozrobky stratehiyi ekoloho-ekonomichnoho rozvytku rekreatsiyno-turystychnykh system [Imperatives to elaborate the strategy of ecological and economic development of recreational and tourist systems]. Bulletin of Berdyansk University of Management and Business, 3 (27), 84-90. [In Ukrainian].
10. Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision Adopted by the 7th Conference of The Parties. Ecosystem Approach. UNEP/CBD/COP. URL: Cop-07-Dec-11-En (Cbd.Int)
11. Eugenio-Martin, J., & Campos-Soria, J. (2014). Economic crisis and tourism expenditure cutback decision. Annals of Tourism Research, 44, 53-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.08.013.
12. Job, J., & Passler, F. (2013). Links between Nature-Based Tourism, Protected Areas, Poverty Alleviation and Crises – The Example of Wasini Island (Kenia). Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 1, 18-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2013.04.004.
13. Shubaly, O. (2011). Metodychni ta prykladni zasady intehralnoho otsinyuvannya kompleksnosti vykorystannya lisoresursnoho potentsialu [Methodical and applied principles of the integrated assessment of complex use of forest resources potential]. Statistics of Ukraine, 3, 60-66. [In Ukrainian].
14. Pelishenko, V. (2015). Teoretyko-metodychni pidkhody otsinky rivnya konkurentnoho potentsialu sanatorno-kurortnykh pidpryyemstv [Theoretical and methodological approaches to assessing the level of competitive potential of sanatoriums]. Bulletin of Berdyansk University of Management and Business, 3 (31), 46-52. [In Ukrainian].
15. UN WTO (2004). Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations: A Guidebook. United Nations World Tourism Organization, Madrid. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284407262
16. Stupen, M., & Andrushenko, V. (2016). Terytorialna pryvablyvist pryrodno-rekreatsiynykh resursiv Zhytomyrshchyny [Territorial attractiveness of natural and recreational resources of Zhytomyr region]. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University, 17 (4), 94-97. [In Ukrainian].
17. Tourist activities in Ukraine in 2020. State Statistics Service in Ukraine. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua. [In Ukrainian].
18. Kirkova, N. (2014). Prohnozuvannya osnovnykh tendentsiy rozvytku turystychnoyi haluzi Ukrayiny [Forecasting key trends of the development of tourism industry in Ukraine]. Efficient economy, 7. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=3197. [In Ukrainian].
Article publication date: 2022
Date of online version: 2022
DOI: 10.37100/2616-7689.2022.12(31).4
UDC 332.122:338.486
JEL CLASSIFICATION: I15, R14, Q57
Mariia Ilina
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher,
Public Institution "Institute of Environmental Economics and
Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine"
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5555-1614
DIFFERENTIATING LOCAL RECREATIONAL POLICIES IN THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH FRAMEWORK
Abstract: This paper presents some approaches to develop national and local policy of recreational natural resources use based on zonal recreational capacity, demographic properties and economic peculiarities of different areas, including mountains. Ecosystem approach is applied for the differentiation. Recreational natural resources management is the component of national policy of natural resources use. The recreational natural resources management is broader term than the recreational industry management, since the first one includes protection and restoration of the resources. The multiplicative economic effect and joint use of recreational resources with other users are key features of the industry. Significant discrepancy between the scope of available recreational resources and efficiency of their use are inherent for all Ukraine’s regions.
The multilevel algorithm of the recreational resources and industry classification of areas is developed. The algorithm concludes with several policy models of the recreational natural resources use and management taking into account types of settlements (urban, rural, and intermediate), proximity of settlements to urban centres (urbanized and peripheral), recreational capacity of areas (high, medium, and low), and economic efficiency of the local recreational industry (efficient, moderately efficient, and inefficient). Accordingly, the three types of communities’ development strategy have been identified like the recreational centre, dominant recreational industry, and recreations for locals. The novelty of this research consists in representation of approaches depicting the structure and assessing the capacity of local recreational recourses and the industry. Consequently, the multilevel algorithm classifying areas by recreational capacities and capabilities assist to define models of the local policies.
Key words: recreational resources; recreation-and-tourism industry; recreational capacity; ecosystem approach; algorithm.
Language version: English
References
1. Shtukmeyster, V. (2015). Ekonomichna sutnist rozvytku rekreatsiynoho pryrodokorystuvannya [The economic essence of the development of recreational nature use]. Sustain nature management, 3, 61-66. [In Ukrainian].
2. Rudenko, V., Vatseba, V., & Solovey, T. (2001). Pryrodo-resursnyy potentsial pryrodnykh rehioniv Ukrayiny [Natural resources potential of the natural regions of Ukraine]. Chernivtsi: Ruta. 268 р. [In Ukrainian].
3. Matsola, V. (1997). Rekreatsiyno-turystychnyy kompleks Ukrayiny [Recreational and tourist complex of Ukraine]. Lviv. 259 р. [In Ukrainian].
4. Beydik, O. (2001). Rekreatsiyno-turyst•sʹki resursy Ukrayiny: metodolohiya ta metodyka analizu, terminolohiya, rayonuvannya [Recreational and tourist resources in Ukraine: methodology and methods of the analysis, terminology, and zoning]. Kyiv: VPTS “Kyyivsʹkyy universytet”. 395 р. [In Ukrainian].
5. Cherchyk, L., & Mostenets, O. (2016). Mekhanizm zabezpechennya konkurentospromozhnosti rekreatsiynoyi systemy rehionu [Mechanism providing competitiveness of the recreational system of the region]. Lutsk: East-European National University named by Lesia Ukrainka. 2014 р. [In Ukrainian].
6. Bernini, C., & Cracolici, М. (2015). Is participation in the tourism market an opportunity for everyone? Some evidence from Italy. Tourism Economics, 22 (1), 57-79.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2014.0409
7. Massidda, C., & Etzo, І. (2012). The determinants of Italian domestic tourism: A panel data analysis. Tourism management, 33 (3), 603-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.06.017
8. Yakovenko, I., & Tahan, T. (2009). Sutnist i spetsyfichni osoblyvosti terytorialnoyi rekreatsiynoyi nerivnosti [Essence and specific features of the territorial recreational inequality]. Culture of the Black Sea People, 152, 50-54. [In Ukrainian].
9. Bezugly, I. (2014). Imperatyvy rozrobky stratehiyi ekoloho-ekonomichnoho rozvytku rekreatsiyno-turystychnykh system [Imperatives to elaborate the strategy of ecological and economic development of recreational and tourist systems]. Bulletin of Berdyansk University of Management and Business, 3 (27), 84-90. [In Ukrainian].
10. Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision Adopted by the 7th Conference of The Parties. Ecosystem Approach. UNEP/CBD/COP. URL: Cop-07-Dec-11-En (Cbd.Int)
11. Eugenio-Martin, J., & Campos-Soria, J. (2014). Economic crisis and tourism expenditure cutback decision. Annals of Tourism Research, 44, 53-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.08.013.
12. Job, J., & Passler, F. (2013). Links between Nature-Based Tourism, Protected Areas, Poverty Alleviation and Crises – The Example of Wasini Island (Kenia). Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 1, 18-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2013.04.004.
13. Shubaly, O. (2011). Metodychni ta prykladni zasady intehralnoho otsinyuvannya kompleksnosti vykorystannya lisoresursnoho potentsialu [Methodical and applied principles of the integrated assessment of complex use of forest resources potential]. Statistics of Ukraine, 3, 60-66. [In Ukrainian].
14. Pelishenko, V. (2015). Teoretyko-metodychni pidkhody otsinky rivnya konkurentnoho potentsialu sanatorno-kurortnykh pidpryyemstv [Theoretical and methodological approaches to assessing the level of competitive potential of sanatoriums]. Bulletin of Berdyansk University of Management and Business, 3 (31), 46-52. [In Ukrainian].
15. UN WTO (2004). Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations: A Guidebook. United Nations World Tourism Organization, Madrid. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284407262
16. Stupen, M., & Andrushenko, V. (2016). Terytorialna pryvablyvist pryrodno-rekreatsiynykh resursiv Zhytomyrshchyny [Territorial attractiveness of natural and recreational resources of Zhytomyr region]. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University, 17 (4), 94-97. [In Ukrainian].
17. Tourist activities in Ukraine in 2020. State Statistics Service in Ukraine. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua. [In Ukrainian].
18. Kirkova, N. (2014). Prohnozuvannya osnovnykh tendentsiy rozvytku turystychnoyi haluzi Ukrayiny [Forecasting key trends of the development of tourism industry in Ukraine]. Efficient economy, 7. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=3197. [In Ukrainian].
Article publication date: 2022
Date of online version: 2022